Curator
human, future
mid-Anthropocene
Anthropocene epoch stratotype specimen
c. 0001900 BCE +\- 1ma
This is an example of a portrayal of climate change over time. This review [is] proved to be possible. There are many areas involving agriculture, carbon, and widespread destruction, and some historians say that the increase in temperature is increasing. People of the world. Yes, YM [sic] supports the concept of Eocene humans, partly as a biology teacher.
Note: The chasm between our lingua franca and the language used by this future curator is a significant obstacle for us to translate and understand the interpretation text they have provided. From our endeavour, though, we may infer that the future curators generally believe the piece of specimen has demonstrated the change of climate.
IMoB 6382.9
Curator
human, far-future
Quinary epoch
Anthropocene epoch stratotype specimen
c. 0001900 BCE +\- 1ma
This Anthropocene ’stratotype’ specimen is evidence of paleogeological fraud in the misrepresentation of geological evidence during the 'Anthropocene Controversy'. This is the misidentification of human-induced global climatic warming effects in the Late Holocene interglacial. This led to the transitory definition of the ‘Anthropocene’ as a new geological epoch, which was later corrected by the Global Union of Geological Sciences, following the designation of the late Quaternary/Quinary boundary. The Quinary Ice Age epoch has been characterised by global cooling, sea level decline, and sustained glaciation, that may have been avoided if our human ancestors had acted more quickly to prevent the inevitable climatic cooling of the Late Quaternary.
IMoB 6382.9
_edited.png)
Take a little piece of the future home with you!
Find products related to this exhibit for sale in our museum shop.
.png)